Best used for
Protected disclosuresDetriment chronologyCausation evidence
Use this workflow when the research question fits these evidence themes and can be checked against selected sources.
Guided workflow
Whistleblowing detriment
Review protected disclosure, causation, detriment, chronology, and employer explanation patterns without predicting outcome.
Tribuno provides Employment Tribunal research assistance and legal information only. It does not provide legal advice, representation, or guaranteed outcome prediction.
Workflow contract
When to use this workflow
Each public workflow has a defined research role, explicit boundaries and an expected output shape. It is a starting point for source-cited research, not a route to a legal conclusion.
Not for
Assuming disclosure statusCausation predictionUnreviewed chronology
These boundaries keep the workflow away from prediction, unsupported conclusions and unreviewed live facts.
Output shape
Chronology-led memo separating disclosure status, alleged detriment, employer explanation and causation caution.
Source inputs
What the workflow needs before drafting
A useful workflow starts with focused facts and selected sources. Public examples remain illustrative; real workspace output should use selected decisions and promoted Lens passages.
Disclosure chronologyAlleged detriment listSelected ET comparablesCase-law Lens context
Source trail
Whistleblowing source trail example
The sample source trail shows the kind of source-family separation this workflow should preserve before any memo wording is trusted.
| Ref | Source family | Research role | Trace shown | User check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | ET decision | Fact-pattern comparable | Used to compare the timing and content of alleged disclosures against later workplace treatment. | Check whether the tribunal accepted the disclosure, its recipient, and the protected-disclosure reasoning. |
| S2 | ET decision | Distinguishing or adverse comparable | Used to test whether timing alone was treated as enough, or whether the tribunal required stronger causation evidence. | Inspect the employer's explanation and any non-disclosure reason for the alleged treatment. |
| L1 | Case Law Lens | Authority context | Used to keep principle context visible without using Lens material as a factual comparable. | Check whether further authority research is needed for the live professional question. |
Workflow path
A practical sequence for controlled early-access use.
01
Separate alleged disclosures from later treatment.
02
Search for comparable chronology and detriment findings.
03
Use source Lens context for statutory and authority framing.
04
Generate a memo that marks source-supported and uncertain points.
Sample prompt
The workflow starts with a narrow research question
Example research question
What source-backed themes arise where alleged detriments follow internal protected disclosures?
Expected output
What Tribuno should produce
The useful output is a source-cited research view, not a definitive answer to the user's legal position.
Comparable decisions
Selected ET decisions should be compared by facts, process, evidence and reasoning, with source links visible.
Lens context
Source Lens findings should be shown separately and promoted only when useful for the memo context.
Research memo
The memo should include a caveat, source labels, limitations and a compact traceability section.
Review the sample before requesting access.
The sample shows the expected structure and caveats without requiring workspace access.