HR evidence review
Frame the workplace question, gather relevant tribunal decisions, and appraise whether the sources actually support the issue under review.
Employment Tribunal research platform
Employment Tribunal research, organised around sources
Tribuno helps professional users structure employment-law research, compare tribunal decisions, inspect source-family lenses and draft cautious, source-cited research memos.
- Designed for
- HR consultants
- Designed for
- Employment lawyers
- Designed for
- In-house HR teams
- Designed for
- Tribunal researchers
Research file
Unfair dismissal process review
A professional workspace should show what has been retrieved, what has been checked, and what still needs review before a memo is treated as useful research support.
| Ref | Source | Use in research | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | ET comparable | Dismissal process and investigation fairness | Saved |
| L1 | ACAS Lens | Process guidance for disciplinary handling | Check wording |
| L2 | Statute Lens | Relevant statutory framework and source link | Source linked |
| M1 | Memo readiness | Citations present, thin areas still flagged | Needs review |
5
Source families
12
Saved decisions
Caveated
Memo stance
Designed for professional review
Useful when the question depends on evidence, context and source checking
Tribuno is shaped for users who need to explain why a source matters, not just receive a fluent answer.
Employment-law research
Move from fact pattern to source text, Lens passages, citation labels, and cautious memo drafting without hiding the underlying material.
Tribunal-source comparison
Keep ET decisions, ACAS guidance, statute, procedure and higher-authority case law visibly separate while comparing how they inform the research question.
Source-first workflow
The interface keeps the research trail visible
Employment Tribunal research is usually a chain of source choices. The UX should make each choice inspectable before it becomes part of a memo.
01
Profile the matter
Structure facts, chronology, issues and research questions before searching.
02
Find source decisions
Search comparable ET decisions and inspect metadata, snippets and source links.
03
Build the research file
Save decisions, review Lens panels, and check citation/source coverage.
04
Draft cautiously
Generate a research memo from selected sources with visible caveats and citations.
Research starting points
Choose a narrow tribunal research task
Each workflow starts from a bounded source question, then routes to the source trail and sample output.
The list stays deliberately narrow. It is a research entry point, not a menu of legal outcomes.
Unfair dismissal
Compare investigation, consultation, warnings, appeal, and reasonableness patterns across selected tribunal decisions.
Reasonable adjustments
Structure adjustment requests, knowledge, occupational health evidence, implementation delay, and comparator reasoning.
Whistleblowing
Review protected disclosure, causation, detriment, chronology, and employer explanation patterns without predicting outcome.
ACAS process
Inspect ACAS Code and guidance passages beside selected ET decisions while keeping guidance separate from tribunal comparables.
Remedy comparison
Compare remedy reasoning, compensation headings, mitigation, reductions, and award signals across source decisions.
Workspace access
Start with source-cited samples, then open the workspace
Access is account-based. Review sample outputs and the product workflow first so you can judge whether Tribuno fits the way you review tribunal sources.
What Tribuno is built for
- Find and organise Employment Tribunal sources around a focused research question.
- Keep citation links, Lens context and memo caveats visible while reviewing output.
- Use it for research support, not legal advice, representation or outcome prediction.
- Use only the matter details needed for research, especially when information is sensitive.