Reasonable adjustments
Structured sample for adjustment requests, occupational-health evidence, workplace implementation delay, and evidence gaps.
Tribuno provides Employment Tribunal research assistance and legal information only. It does not provide legal advice, representation, or guaranteed outcome prediction.
Research question
Synthetic scenario for demonstration: recommendations are made after occupational-health input, but implementation is delayed and the reason for delay is disputed.
Source trail
The sample shows the level of source visibility a professional user should expect before relying on any generated prose.
Fact-pattern comparable
Used to compare when the employer knew enough to consider adjustments and whether the request was specific.
Check before use
Confirm the source chronology and the tribunal's treatment of knowledge, medical evidence, and employee communications.
Fact-pattern comparable
Used to inspect whether delay was explained by operational evidence, uncertainty, or lack of follow-up.
Check before use
Check whether the adjustment was practical, trialled, rejected, or simply left unresolved.
Legal-framework context
Used to keep the statutory framework visible without turning the sample into legal advice.
Check before use
Verify the current statutory text and any authority needed for the specific professional question.
Comparison matrix
A sample should show comparison logic, not just a polished paragraph.
| Issue | Sources | What the sample supports | Professional use | Check before use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge and trigger point | S1L1 | The sample directs the reviewer to identify when the employer had enough information to consider adjustments. | Helps frame a chronology-led research question rather than a generic disability-discrimination answer. | Do not treat the existence of medical evidence as enough; inspect what the employer actually knew. |
| Implementation delay | S2 | The delay source separates unexplained drift from evidence-backed operational timing. | Supports a memo section on whether delay needs more factual evidence before any conclusion can be drawn. | Check dates, decision-makers, feasibility, and whether any temporary measures were considered. |
| Adjustment specificity | S1S2 | The selected comparables should show whether the requested or recommended adjustment was concrete enough to compare. | Helps the user decide whether more case-profile facts are needed before drafting. | Avoid presenting a vague request as equivalent to a specific recommended workplace step. |
Memo extract
The sample extract is written as cautious research assistance. It keeps labels close to the claim they support.
The sample sources would support a memo organised around employer knowledge, adjustment specificity, and the reason for any implementation delay. The report should mark missing chronology and feasibility evidence rather than fill gaps with assumptions.
Before relying on the comparison, the user should check whether the occupational-health recommendation was clear, whether management accepted it, and what explanation exists for the period before implementation.
Review checks
The sample is useful only if it makes the user's source-checking work clearer.
Confirm request date, medical evidence date, decision date, and implementation date.
Use statutory Lens material for context and ET decisions for fact-pattern comparison.
Flag missing feasibility or operational evidence instead of drawing a firm conclusion.
Important limits
It does not advise on a real matter, predict an outcome, estimate an award, or replace source checking and professional judgement.
The public labels demonstrate report structure only. Real workspace output must cite selected decisions and promoted Lens passages.
The sample does not assess whether a person is disabled or whether an adjustment was legally required.
A real report must check medical evidence, employer knowledge, feasibility and implementation dates before drafting.
Use the sample as research assistance only, with source checking and independent professional review.
Workspace access is available by request. Start with sample or synthetic matters where possible.
