Best used for
Adjustment requestsKnowledge and evidenceImplementation delay
Use this workflow when the research question fits these evidence themes and can be checked against selected sources.
Guided workflow
Disability discrimination and reasonable adjustments
Structure adjustment requests, knowledge, occupational health evidence, implementation delay, and comparator reasoning.
Tribuno provides Employment Tribunal research assistance and legal information only. It does not provide legal advice, representation, or guaranteed outcome prediction.
Workflow contract
When to use this workflow
Each public workflow has a defined research role, explicit boundaries and an expected output shape. It is a starting point for source-cited research, not a route to a legal conclusion.
Not for
Diagnosing disability statusReplacing medical evidenceOutcome prediction
These boundaries keep the workflow away from prediction, unsupported conclusions and unreviewed live facts.
Output shape
Evidence-gap memo organised around knowledge, adjustment specificity, implementation delay and source caveats.
Source inputs
What the workflow needs before drafting
A useful workflow starts with focused facts and selected sources. Public examples remain illustrative; real workspace output should use selected decisions and promoted Lens passages.
Adjustment chronologyOccupational-health evidenceSelected ET comparablesStatutory Lens context
Source trail
Reasonable adjustments source trail example
The sample source trail shows the kind of source-family separation this workflow should preserve before any memo wording is trusted.
| Ref | Source family | Research role | Trace shown | User check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | ET decision | Fact-pattern comparable | Used to compare when the employer knew enough to consider adjustments and whether the request was specific. | Confirm the source chronology and the tribunal's treatment of knowledge, medical evidence, and employee communications. |
| S2 | ET decision | Fact-pattern comparable | Used to inspect whether delay was explained by operational evidence, uncertainty, or lack of follow-up. | Check whether the adjustment was practical, trialled, rejected, or simply left unresolved. |
| L1 | Statute Lens | Legal-framework context | Used to keep the statutory framework visible without turning the sample into legal advice. | Verify the current statutory text and any authority needed for the specific professional question. |
Workflow path
A practical sequence for controlled early-access use.
01
Summarise the asserted impairment, knowledge, and adjustment history.
02
Find ET decisions discussing similar barriers and workplace steps.
03
Separate statutory context from fact-pattern comparables.
04
Draft a research memo with uncertainty and evidence-gap notes.
Sample prompt
The workflow starts with a narrow research question
Example research question
Which comparable decisions discuss delayed reasonable adjustments after occupational health recommendations?
Expected output
What Tribuno should produce
The useful output is a source-cited research view, not a definitive answer to the user's legal position.
Comparable decisions
Selected ET decisions should be compared by facts, process, evidence and reasoning, with source links visible.
Lens context
Source Lens findings should be shown separately and promoted only when useful for the memo context.
Research memo
The memo should include a caveat, source labels, limitations and a compact traceability section.
Review the sample before requesting access.
The sample shows the expected structure and caveats without requiring workspace access.