Sample outputs

Inspect the source trail before asking for access.

The best sample should show how sources were selected, how comparable decisions differ, where Lens material sits, and what must be checked before a memo is used.

Open flagship sample Browse workflows

Tribuno provides Employment Tribunal research assistance and legal information only. It does not provide legal advice, representation, or guaranteed outcome prediction.

Flagship sample

A public sample should look like a research file, not a placeholder

Start here to see the fuller pattern: question, source trail, comparison matrix, cautious memo extract, and professional review checks.

Unfair dismissal

Flagship sample: unfair dismissal process review

A fuller public sample showing source trail, comparison matrix, cautious memo extract, and review checks for a process-focused unfair dismissal question.

Investigation scopeAppeal independenceACAS process contextSource-checking workflow

Open flagship sample

Source trail

4 labelled sources with role and review checks.

Comparison matrix

4 issue rows showing support, use, and caveats.

Memo extract

Citation-labelled paragraphs that remain cautious and source-bound.

Workflow-specific examples

Use the smaller samples to inspect other research shapes

Each sample keeps source labels, source-family boundaries, a memo extract and review checks visible. A real memo should be generated from selected workspace sources.

Reasonable adjustments

Sample memo: reasonable adjustments

Structured sample for adjustment requests, occupational-health evidence, workplace implementation delay, and evidence gaps.

S1S2L1

Open sample View workflow

Whistleblowing

Sample memo: whistleblowing detriment

Structured sample for protected-disclosure chronology, alleged detriment, employer explanation, and cautious causation language.

S1S2L1

Open sample View workflow

ACAS process

Sample Lens brief: ACAS disciplinary and grievance process

Structured Lens brief showing how ACAS passages can sit beside selected tribunal decisions without becoming fact-pattern comparables.

L1L2S1

Open sample View workflow

Remedy comparison

Sample memo: remedy and award comparison

Structured sample for compensation headings, mitigation, reductions, and remedy reasoning without presenting award prediction.

S1S2S3

Open sample View workflow

What to look for

A useful sample should make the evidence work visible

The public sample is not a substitute for workspace research. It should help a professional judge whether the product preserves enough source context to be worth requesting.

Source selection

The source trail should say why each decision or Lens passage was selected and what must be checked.

Comparison reasoning

The matrix should show what each source supports, what it does not prove, and where facts diverge.

Review before reliance

The sample should keep non-advice wording, uncertainty, and professional source checking visible.

Ready to try the workspace?

Workspace access is available by request and support is asynchronous.

Request workspace access Review trust controls